MSSP vs In-House SOC: A Full Comparison

Deciding on your cybersecurity setup is a big choice. You can choose managed cybersecurity services or build your own security operations center (SOC). Both can work well, but the decision will impact the cost of security and the scalability of your security operations.

Here’s what you need to know to make a smart choice.

Key takeaways:

• MSSPs cost less and protect you faster.
• An in-house SOC offers more control and builds company knowledge, but at a higher cost.
• A hybrid approach is possible with the right partner.
• The choice depends on your desired level of ownership and budget.

MSSP vs. in-house SOC: A basic comparison

Let’s compare MSSPs and in-house SOCs.

That’s the basic overview of MSSP vs. in-house SOC.

But there’s more detail to consider. Here are some common questions from companies making this choice.

How do managed cyber security services differ from in-house security?

What’s the real difference between a managed security service and doing it yourself?

A managed security service gives you 24/7 monitoring, proven processes, and all the tech you need for a subscription fee. An in-house team gives you more control, but you have to build and maintain everything yourself.

MSSPs bundle everything you need, like security monitoring and automated responses. If you do it yourself, you have to put all the pieces together on your own time and budget.

What this looks like in practice

A good managed service provider gives you all the tools you need, like a SIEM, EDR, and ticketing system, ready to go. If you build your own team, you do all that work yourself.

Providers have a lot of experience from working with many clients. They have tested plans for dealing with security issues. An in-house team can be customized for your business, but 24/7 protection is hard without a large staff.

Where each approach fits

• Choose managed services for quick 24/7 coverage and a full security toolkit at a lower cost.
• Choose in-house security for custom processes and direct control, if you have the budget for it.

Checklist: decision drivers

• Do you need protection during business hours or 24/7?
• How mature are your current security tools?
• What are your compliance and governance requirements?
• Is it more important to get protected quickly or to build your own system over time?
• Do you need a predictable budget, or can you handle larger upfront costs?

What are the key cost differences between MSSPs and in-house teams?

Let’s talk about money. Where does it all go?

With your own team, you pay for salaries, benefits, training, and software. For 24/7 protection, you will need several people for each role. A managed service makes this a predictable monthly bill. You also share tool costs with other clients.

Also, remember the hidden costs. Hiring takes time, and a slow security response can be very expensive.

Where the dollars go (in-house)

• People: Good security analysts are expensive. For 24/7 coverage, you’ll need several, and their salaries add up. The average salary for a security analyst is over $124,000 a year, not including benefits.
• Platforms: You have to buy all your own tools, like a SIEM, EDR, and threat intelligence feeds.
• Maintenance: You also have to pay for ongoing costs like training and keeping your security tools up-to-date.

Where the dollars go (MSSP/SOCaaS)

• Subscription: You pay a regular fee for access to tools, data, and a team of experts.
• Economies of scale: Providers share the cost of their tools and staff across many clients. This usually means you pay less for the same level of security.

The impact of MSSP pricing models

• Many MSSPs have pricing that changes based on how many users you have or how much you use their services. This can make your bills hard to predict.
• At Corsica Technologies, we offer predictable monthly billing for our managed cybersecurity services so you always know what to expect.

The “hidden” cost-of-delay

A data breach is costly. The average cost is $4.4 million in 2025. This shows why it is so important to find and stop threats quickly. A faster response means less risk. This is a key part of the ROI calculation when you decide what to do.

Budget questions to ask

• What coverage do we need now and in the next year? (Business hours or 24/7?)
• Can we afford to hire, train, and keep the right people?
• What is the potential cost of a data breach?

How do response times compare between MSSPs and internal security teams?

When a security breach happens, every second counts. Who is faster? An MSSP or your own team?

The answer depends on your coverage and readiness. MSSPs usually have 24/7 monitoring and set plans, so they can find and stop threats faster.

Your own team can be just as fast, but you need enough people, 24/7 coverage, and plenty of practice.

What drives faster responses

• Ready-made plans: A plan is key before an incident. MSSPs excel at this, and your team can too.
• Clear roles and practice: Everyone should know their job and practice. This helps both MSSPs and in-house teams respond faster.

Practical reality

Many companies can’t afford a 24/7 security team. MSSPs offer this coverage with their analysts and plans. An in-house team can also be effective with the right investment in playbooks and on-call staff.

Ways to improve MTTR in either model

• Practice your response plan: Regularly test your plan to find and fix any problems.
• Keep your plans up-to-date: Review your plans every quarter to make sure they are still current.
• Know who to call: Have a clear plan for who to contact in a crisis.

What does it look like to take a hybrid, co-managed approach to cybersecurity?

You don’t have to choose between an MSSP and an in-house team. A hybrid model can give you the best of both worlds.

Your team manages the big picture, like setting policies and strategy. The MSSP provides 24/7 monitoring, advanced tools, and incident response help.

This approach is popular because it helps companies improve their security without doing everything themselves or giving up all control.

How the model works in practice

• Shared duties: Your team manages risk and compliance. The MSSP monitors for threats and handles initial responses.
• Teamwork: Both teams use the same systems, so everyone has the same information.
• You’re in charge: You decide what the MSSP can do on its own and what needs your approval.

Why organizations choose hybrid

• Hiring is hard: A co-managed model helps you fill security roles.
• Save money: You get the benefits of a 24/7 SOC without the full cost.
• Get better faster: You can use the MSSP’s tools and plans without losing your own team’s knowledge.

Key success factors

• Clear roles: Everyone needs to know their responsibilities.
• Shared information: Both teams need access to the same data.
• Regular meetings: Meet often to stay on the same page.
• Practice together: Joint drills build trust and improve teamwork.

Questions to ask before committing

• How will the provider’s tools work with ours?
• What are the SLAs for different types of incidents?
• How will we get information if we change our security model later?

Why do MSSPs often have broader threat detection capabilities than in-house teams?

Why are MSSPs often better at spotting threats? Because they see more.

MSSPs review data from all their clients. This gives them a wider view of threats. They use this data to improve their detection and intelligence. They also use automation and threat hunting, which is hard for one company to do alone.

Under the hood

• More data: Providers see data from many companies in different industries. This helps them spot new threats early.
• More threats: MSSPs see a wide variety of attacks, which helps them stay on top of the latest threats.

Advantages you can replicate internally

• Use the ATT&CK framework: This framework helps you understand and defend against common attacks.
• Share information: Join groups to share and receive threat intelligence.
• Invest in your team: Give your team the time and resources they need to write detection rules and keep your systems up-to-date.

Signals that MSSP breadth is paying off

• You see fewer false alarms over time.
• Your security alerts are linked to known attack methods.
• Your provider quickly adds new defenses when new threats show up.

How does control over security policies differ in both approaches?

With an in-house team, you control everything. You make the rules and decide when to make exceptions. With an MSSP, you are still in charge, but you let them handle the daily tasks based on your rules.

Good MSSPs are clear about their responsibilities and what’s in your contract. But you are still ultimately responsible for your company’s security.

Control model in practice

• In-house: You make and enforce your own rules. You decide on the level of risk you’ll accept and manage your own security plans and tools.
• Managed: You approve the policies and agreements, and the MSSP carries them out. A good provider will be clear about what they can do on their own and what needs your approval. They will also be clear about what your contract includes to avoid surprise bills.

Questions to lock down before signing

• Who can take action without approval?
• What is included in the contract, and what costs extra?
• Is there a Cybersecurity Service Guarantee?
• How are policy changes handled?
• How is incident data stored?

What are long-term implications of outsourcing versus building internal security?

Choosing an MSSP or an in-house team has long-term effects. Here is what to expect from each.

Outsourcing to an MSSP is a fast way to get protected without the stress of hiring, but it can make you reliant on your provider. An in-house team gives you more control and knowledge, but it costs more and requires constant investment.

Remember, finding and keeping good security people is a challenge for everyone.

If you outsource (MSSP/SOCaaS)

• Pros: It costs less, protects you faster, and gives you 24/7 coverage. You also get a wider view of threats and easier budgeting.
• Cons: You will depend on your provider. You need to manage this relationship well. Be clear about what they will do and how long they will keep your data.

If you build in-house

• Pros: Your security team will be in sync with your business. You will have full policy control and build valuable in-house knowledge.
• Cons: It is more expensive. Talent is hard to find and keep. It also needs strong leadership to be effective.

Strategic considerations for the next 3–5 years

• Hiring: Finding and keeping good security people is a long-term challenge.
• Hybrid models: Many companies are choosing a hybrid approach. They manage the big picture and outsource the 24/7 work. They review this choice regularly to make sure it still works for them.
• Constant improvement: No matter what you choose, you need to invest in training and tracking your progress. The security world is always changing, and you need to keep up.

Decision framework (make it durable)

• Set your goals: What do you want your security program to achieve?
• Assess your situation: What are your current security strengths and weaknesses?
• Create a plan: How will you reach your goals in the next 12-18 months?
• Review your progress: How will you ensure your security program stays on track?