You get a single team handling cybersecurity, IT, AI consulting, and data integration services like EDI, filling the gaps in your team.
“Corsica is a one-stop shop for us. If I have a problem, I can go to my vCIO or a number of people, and you take care of it. That’s an investment in mutual success.”
– Greg Sopcak | Southern Michigan Bank & Trust
From 24/7 SOC services to MDR/SIEM, penetration testing and training, we’ve got you covered.
Get the expert support you need for your network, on-premises devices, VoiP, M365, Google Workplace, and everything in between.
Full support of compliance frameworks, including CJIS, HIPAA, CMMC, NIST, SOC 2, and more
Cut through the hype with smart strategies and right-fit AI solutions for your organization.
Take strategic steps with confidence as you collaborate with our expert business and vCIO consultants.
Get cloud security, integration, server virtualization, and optimization strategies to reduce your cloud costs.
Connect any data source to any other with robust solutions and managed services.
Stay ahead of the curve, eliminate waste, and grow revenue with next-generation technologies.
Expert consulting, implementation, integration, managed services, and cybersecurity for Microsoft products.
One program. One partner. Complete AI transformation.
It takes dedicated experience to use technology strategically in your industry. That’s why we specialize in certain verticals while offering comprehensive technology services.
From webinars and video tutorials to guides and blogs, we’ve got resources to help you and your team address any technology challenge.
Originally published March 6, 2025. Completely refreshed July 1, 2026.
Are you easy to hack?
That’s the uncomfortable question every organization should be able to answer—and most can’t. You’ve invested in firewalls, endpoint protection, and maybe a SOC. But do you actually know whether an attacker could get in? And if they did, how far they’d get?
Penetration testing is how you find out. This guide walks through what a penetration test is, the different types, exactly how the process works, and how to prepare for one—so you know what you’re buying before you ever pick up the phone.
Key takeaways:
Penetration testing (or “pen testing”) is a cybersecurity exercise in which authorized experts, known as ethical hackers, deliberately try to breach your systems to find and exploit weaknesses. The process reveals weaknesses that an organization wouldn’t have discovered before a breach. Consequently, the findings of a penetration test are often used to determine both short-term and long-term cybersecurity priorities.
Theoretically, your own team could test your defenses, but there’s a catch. If the same people who designed and maintain your network are the ones grading it, you’ve built a conflict of interest into the exercise. Do your engineers really want to find flaws in their own work? That’s exactly why most organizations bring in an independent party—and why penetration testing exists as a distinct discipline.
Point solutions in cybersecurity tell you what should be protected. A penetration test tells you whether a system is actually protected. Short of a real breach, a penetration test is often the only way to see how your defenses hold up against a determined human attacker who can chain together several small weaknesses into a full compromise.
Note that major compliance frameworks have come to require penetration testing. Frameworks and mandates like PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, and CMMC either require or strongly expect regular penetration testing. (To see how testing maps to a specific framework, explore Corsica’s IT compliance services.)
If you already run vulnerability scans, you might wonder whether a pentest is the same thing. It isn’t. Both deal with network security, but each one answers different questions.
Vulnerability scanning | Penetration testing | |
Approach | Passive—identifies known weaknesses | Active—attempts to exploit weaknesses |
Performed by | Automated software | Human ethical hackers (using tools) |
What it reveals | Potential entry points | Proven, real-world entry points |
Chained attacks | Can’t combine multiple flaws | Chains weaknesses together like a real attacker |
Judgment | Limited to its rules and signatures | Applies human intuition and problem-solving |
Output | A list of detected vulnerabilities | A report of what was actually exploited—and how |
Here’s the short version. Vulnerability scanning is about finding weaknesses. Penetration testing is about proving how an attacker could use them against you. A scanner can flag ten open issues, but a pentester can show that two of them, combined, would hand over your domain controller. That difference is critical.
You’ll often see the two paired together as “vulnerability assessment and penetration testing,” or VAPT. A vulnerability assessment casts a wide net to catalog as many issues as possible; a penetration test goes deep on the ones that matter, validating real impact. Many organizations run frequent automated assessments and layer periodic penetration tests on top—broad coverage plus proven depth.
There’s no single, basic type of penetration test. There are multiple types, and the right one depends on what you’re trying to protect. It helps to think in two dimensions: what is being tested, and how much the tester knows going in.
Type | What it tests | When you need it |
External network | Internet-facing systems, from an attacker’s outside starting point | Measuring your first line of defense—can someone get in at all? |
Internal network | Lateral movement once inside your perimeter | Understanding the damage an attacker (or malicious insider) could do after a foothold |
Web application | Custom and third-party web apps | You build, sell, or heavily rely on web software |
Cloud | AWS, Azure, GCP configurations and workloads | Misconfigurations and unmanaged attack surface in cloud environments |
Mobile application | iOS/Android apps, their APIs and storage | You publish mobile apps or handle sensitive data on them |
API | Authentication, authorization, and logic of your APIs | APIs expose business logic and data directly to the internet |
Wireless | Wi-Fi networks and access controls | Physical-proximity attacks and rogue access points are a concern |
Social engineering | Your people—via phishing, pretexting, and more | Testing human defenses, not just technical ones |
Physical | Locks, badge access, and on-site controls | Attackers who try to walk in, not just log in |
External vs. internal network testing is the distinction most people ask about. External testing starts from nothing but an internet connection and replicates the scenario most attackers face—can they breach the perimeter? Internal testing starts inside the network and reveals how far an attacker can move laterally once they’re in. An internal test can follow an external one or run on its own. Findings frequently point toward controls like a Zero Trust framework.
For cloud systems specifically, factors like unmanaged attack surface, human error, and misconfiguration drive most exposure, as CrowdStrike notes. Web application testing typically follows the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide, targeting issues like injection attacks, security misconfiguration, and outdated components.
The other lens is how much information the tester starts with. This is where the terms “black box,” “grey box,” and “white box” come in—terms you’ll see in nearly every scope conversation.
Approach | Tester’s starting knowledge | Simulates | Best for |
Black box | None—no access, no documentation | An external attacker starting from scratch | Realistic, adversary’s-eye view of your perimeter |
Grey box | Partial—e.g., a standard user login or basic architecture | An attacker who’s gained a foothold, or a malicious insider | Balancing realism with efficient coverage |
White box | Full—architecture, credentials, sometimes source code | A worst-case insider, or a thorough audit | Deep, exhaustive review of a critical system |
There’s no universally best option for all scenarios. Black box is the most realistic but can miss issues buried deep in a system. White box is the most thorough but less representative of a typical external attack. Grey box splits the difference, which is why it’s a common default for mid-market environments.
Different providers use different methodologies—often mapping to recognized standards like NIST SP 800-115 or the Penetration Testing Execution Standard (PTES). Your provider should be able to explain theirs. That said, nearly every pentest moves through the same six phases.
A penetration testing report is the most crucial deliverable that comes out of the process. It should include:
Curious what that looks like in practice? Check out our sample penetration testing report.
Setting up a pentest isn’t as simple as picking a date. A little preparation is what separates a high-value engagement from a wasted one.
The traditional answer is at least annually and after any significant change to your environment, such as a new application, a major infrastructure shift, or a merger. Many compliance frameworks set a similar cadence.
But point-in-time testing has a limitation. It’s only a snapshot. The day after your test, a new vulnerability or misconfiguration could appear. That’s why two approaches have gained traction:
Automation is a powerful complement, but it doesn’t replace skilled human testers. The creativity to chain unrelated weaknesses into a real attack is still, for now, a human strength. The best programs combine frequent automated coverage with periodic human testing led by experts.
Penetration testing and ethical hacking are closely related. Ethical hacking is the broad practice of legally probing systems for weaknesses, while a penetration test is a specific, scoped engagement that applies those skills to a defined target with clear rules and a formal report.
A vulnerability scan is an automated tool that lists potential weaknesses. A penetration test uses human experts to exploit those weaknesses, proving which ones an attacker could actually use and how far they would get.
The length of a penetration test depends on the scope of the engagement. A focused external network test might take several days. A large, multi-target engagement can run for several weeks. Scoping in the planning phase will determine the timeline.
It’s rarely necessary to run a penetration test in off-hours. Testing during business hours is usually sufficient, not to mention less expensive. Modern vulnerability scanning doesn’t typically overload a healthy server, and if it does, that’s a finding worth knowing. Ethical hackers won’t launch DDoS (distributed denial-of-service) attacks or hold your data for ransom; their goal is to get in, not take you down.
Theoretically, yes. If your team has the expertise, they can run a penetration test themselves. But if they built and maintain the environment, they have an inherent conflict of interest in grading it. An independent tester delivers a more objective, credible result.
Cost varies with the type of test, the size of the environment, and depth of scope. Here’s a consolidated breakdown. Ranges reflect boutique/mid-tier providers. Note that freelancers typically run lower and Big-4 firms typically higher.
Penetration test type | Typical 2026 range (US) | Main cost drivers |
External network | $5,000–$20,000 | Number of internet-facing IPs/hosts; roughly $5K–$10K for up to ~25 IPs, scaling past $15K–$30K for 50+ IPs |
Internal network | $7,000–$35,000 | Lateral-movement/AD complexity, segmentation, number of hosts |
Web application | $5,000–$50,000 | App complexity — a brochure site vs. a multi-tenant SaaS with roles, APIs, SSO, and payment flows; a typical mid-tier web app test runs $8,000–$25,000 |
API | $4,000–$20,000 | Endpoint count, auth model, business-logic depth, data sensitivity |
Cloud (AWS/Azure/GCP) | $10,000–$40,000 | IAM policies, service accounts, storage exposure, cross-account trust, architectural complexity |
Mobile application | $5,000–$30,000 | Priced roughly per platform (iOS/Android); reverse engineering and backend API review add cost |
Social engineering / phishing | $3,000–$12,000 | Realistic lure development and behavioral analysis |
Physical | $5,000–$30,000 | Usually requires on-site presence and travel; lower-confidence range with less published data |
Wireless | ~$4,000–$15,000 (estimate) | Sparsely published; scales with number of SSIDs/sites. Treat as directional |
IoT / embedded | $15,000–$50,000+ | Hardware teardown, firmware analysis, embedded evaluation |
Red team engagement | $30,000–$150,000+ | Multi-vector, objective-based simulation over weeks; senior/specialized talent |
At minimum, annually and after any major change to your systems. Regulated organizations may need more frequent testing. Many companies now supplement their required annual tests with continuous or automated testing between engagements.
If it’s been a while since your last penetration test—or you’ve never run one—it’s time to find out how strong your defenses really are. A pentest can genuinely save your organization from a breach by surfacing weaknesses before criminals exploit them. Contact us today, and let’s take your next step with penetration testing that’s designed for your environment.
Contact us today to get the outside perspective you need for the next step on your journey.
We’ll respond within 1 business day, or you can grab time on our calendar.